Media

A Gun Liberal Has An Epiphany

four-guns.gifMike Thomas, a journalist associated with the Orlando (FL) Sentinel, comes to some logical conclusions in an editorial he wrote about unarmed victims of a violent crime. In the complete editorial, Thomas relates some of the warning signs and the consequences of the victims not taking action to protect themselves.

This is an excerpt from the editorial with highlights I made:

I am not knocking the cops, just acknowledging reality. There are a thousand threats in the Big City. Picking out the real ones from the bluster is an impossible task. Given this reality, given that Central Florida is turning into a bad Mad Max sequel, my liberal belief in gun control is getting wobbly.

I’m not advocating selling machine guns and cop-killer bullets at Wal-Mart. But if somebody faces an immediate threat, I have a hard time understanding why they need to wait three days or longer to buy a handgun for self-protection. Shouldn’t we be allowed to go to a reputable gun store, get a lesson in how to use a specific weapon and buy it after the background check?

The stated reason against this is that some ill-tempered lout will blow a fuse, run off to Guns R Us, buy a Glock and open fire on his spouse, neighbor, boss or co-worker. One might assume someone this prone to venting with a volley already has a gun, locked and loaded.

A 2000 report in the Journal of the American Medical Association, hardly part of the gun lobby, showed cooling-off periods did not reduce homicide rates or overall suicide rates. After examining 51 studies on various gun-control laws, including mandatory waiting periods, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention concluded in 2003 that there was “insufficient evidence” to say they reduced gun violence.

It seems we pass laws that feel good without a lot of proof they are doing any good. Maybe I need a good slap from Ted Kennedy, but I almost buy the National Rifle Association argument that the primary target of gun-control laws would be the people who shoot them at ranges, then lovingly oil and ogle them before safely locking them up.

As far as keeping guns away from bad guys, gun-control laws work as well as crack cocaine-control laws. We even have high school kids in Orange County firing guns in the air at high school athletic events.

If there were no guns, I would say allow no guns. But since all the wrong people already have them, and the cops can’t do much about it except match their firepower, then it may well be time to arm thyself, citizen.

When Florida liberalized permits for concealed weapons in the 1980s, critics predicted a Wild West bloodbath. It never happened. Responsible gun owners don’t use guns irresponsibly. Go figure.

Until the cops get better at enforcing gun control on those who shouldn’t have guns, a better alternative for the rest of us is gun education, gun classes and secure gun storage.

Mike Thomas, in a way, is like journalist Lawrence Solomon, who decided to get into the minds of “global warming deniers” only to come to the conclusion that man-made contributions to climate shift are grossly exaggerated.

Hat Tip to NRA-ILA for pointing me to this story.

NRA on C-SPAN Now!

From Wayne LaPierre, NRA Exec. VP:

Dear Fellow NRA Member,
cav_logo.gif

On Friday, September 21, from 8:30-5:00, NRA is holding its Celebration of American Values at the Capital Hilton in Washington, D.C. The event is being covered live by C-SPAN. Please be sure to watch this important presentation. Also, please be sure to call C-SPAN immediately and tell the station that you’re enjoying the coverage so that they’ll continue to carry this and other NRA events. Please, also be sure to be on the lookout for news reports of this important event on other major networks. Thank you very much.

I presume that those times are Eastern. I don’t have TV access where I am now, so I will get Damsel to check my theory.

Update: Damsel reported that both C-SPAN channels on DirecTV were showing content other than the NRA.

Newsweek Rebukes Newsweek

R. J. Samuelson, a Newsweek contributing editor, calls Sharon Begley, Eve Conant and Eleanor Clift’s “Denial Machine” article “Highly contrived.”

Samuelson goes on to put some reality in perspective by pointing out the prohibitive costs of ‘immediate and positive measures’ to control the ‘runaway greenhouse effect.’

The Senate EPW Minority Blog posted an article on Newsweek’s quasi-retraction:

Washington DC – Robert J. Samuelson, a contributing editor of Newsweek, slapped down his own Magazine for what he termed a “highly contrived story” about the global warming “denial machine.” Samuelson, writing in the August 20, 2007 issue of Newsweek, explains that the Magazine used “discredited” allegations in last week’s issue involving a supposed cash bounty to pay skeptics to dispute global warming science and he chided the Magazine for portraying global warming as a “morality tale.” (LINK) Samuelson’s article titled “Greenhouse Simplicities,” also characterized the “deniers” cover story as “fundamentally misleading.”

“Unfortunately, self-righteous indignation can undermine good journalism. Last week’s Newsweek cover story on global warming is a sobering reminder,” Samuelson wrote.

Who would have thought that Newsweek would debunk its own embarrassing cover story a week later in the very next issue? This kind of reversal does not happen very often in journalism. [Note: It previously took Newsweek 31 years to admit its 1970’s prediction of dire global cooling was completely wrong. See October 24, 2006 article: Senator Inhofe Credited For Prompting Newsweek Admission of Error on 70’s Predictions of Coming Ice Age – (LINK)]

Speaking of prohibitive costs, NRO’s Planet Gore notes that higher taxes such as those proposed by Greenbat Congressman John Dingell, D – Michigan, chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, when he released his plan to fight global warming: a 50 cent gas tax increase and elimination of the mortgage deduction for homes over 3,000 square feet – the average American home is 2,400 sq. ft.

Dingell’s proposal was met by a deafening silence from the climate alarmists, since they know that reckless taxation damages their already weak chances of winning their arguments about climate change.

As for Dingell, he self-righteously wants to pass the costs on to consumers and in typical Democrat fashion, wants to punish success by laying more taxes on people who work hard to succeed. Why, you ask? Because Dingell represents Detroit’s automotive workers and manufacturers, and would rather that you and I pay for cleaning up their act.

Newsweek and the Denial Machine

newsweak.jpgNewsweek is a magazine whose name is only half right. They publish each week, but their content? News? Not so much . . .

This time, Newsweek (a part of the far left MSNBC media) published an article proclaiming that those of us who challenge the ‘consensus’ that the planet is doomed, are in fact part of a massive ‘Denial Machine.’ In the article, the authors claim that there is yet another ‘vast conspiracy’ funded by the oil companies and pushed by research groups like the Competitive Enterprise Institute. They claim that this ‘machine’ is well-funded, but wait! The promoters of the ‘consensus’ are funded way more than the ‘deniers.’

Senator James Inhofe (R – Okla), on the Senate EPW Minority Blog, points out that Newsweek ignored his statistics on relative funding levels of both sides of the issue:

The only problem is — Newsweek knew better. Reporter Eve Conant, who interviewed Senator James Inhofe (R-Okla.), the Ranking Member of the Environment & Public Works Committee, was given all the latest data proving conclusively that it is the proponents of man-made global warming fears that enjoy a monumental funding advantage over the skeptics. (A whopping $50 BILLION to a paltry $19 MILLION for skeptics – Yes, that is BILLION to MILLION . . .)

The ‘Planet Gore‘ blog also published some interesting things about this Newsweek article:


Newsweek: “The Denial Machine”
. Newsweek tries to marginalize global warming opposition by coining the phrase “the denial machine” in this week’s issue.

Newsweek Clueless: How the Tail Wagged the Dog. Newsweek’s cover story, by Sharon Begley and three colleagues, purports to be an expose of the global-warming “denial machine” and how it keeps America Kyoto-free.

More on Newsweek Cover Story. Marlo and Henry have commented well on the Newsweek cover story, and especially the lead item referring to the crazy story out a few months ago involving me and AEI in supposedly trying to “bribe” scientists to undermine the IPCC.

This is the same Newsweek magazine that predicted an ice age was coming in the 1970’s. Can anyone doubt the left-wing agenda of publishers like Newsweek?

Dragon Lady’s World — WOW

This week’s pick for Weblog of the Week is Dragon Lady’s World. The Dragon Lady runs a colorful weblog with a little something for each of our conservative cravings. On a personal note, Dragon Lady helped me resolve a technical issue a couple of months ago, so I know that she runs a tight ship over there.

On today’s DLW, the Dragon Lady posted this little meme about rating your weblog – silly enough, but I clicked on the link anyhow and made this discovery about the rating system; They will rate you “R” not only for using foul language, but for using words like “suicide,” “knife” and “gun.” This is a typical nanny-state/gun-grabber take on firearms and such in the name of “protecting” us.

mingle2-blog-rating

Ridiculous? You bet! However there’s nothing ridiculous about Dragon Lady’s World. We’re happy to name her as our Weblog of the Week and her link will ride along with the Never Forget Tribute this week.

Consensus? What Consensus?

Here’s a nice article written by a journalist who sought to profile ‘deniers,’ or those ‘few’ scientists that doubt that the global warming we’re seeing is caused by man-made greenhouse gasses and pollution. The idea was to expose these ‘kooks on the margins of science’ that he thought were in the minority. After doing the research, however, The Financial Post’s Lawrence Solomon came to the conclusion that there were some serious flaws in the ‘consensus’:

Continue reading…

Desires of the Human Heart

mike-yon.jpgMichael Yon has posted a pair of excellent articles both containing lots of Yon’s photos from Iraq. The articles deal with the topic of progress in Iraq – things you’re not likely to see in most mainstream media outlets. Please check it out.

Desires of the Human Heart – part I
Desires of the Human Heart – part II

Quoting Michael Yon:

There is no need to be here getting shot at unless people at home see the photos and stories of Iraqis, and our people at war.

Michael also needs your support.