Former Vice President Dick Cheney delivered his speech on National Security the other day. Cheney delivered sharp criticism to the current administration’s limp-wristed approach to terrorism. The recently-minted Fox Nation website excerpted the top-10 thoughts from Cheney’s speech:
No. 10: The administration has found that it’s easy to receive applause in Europe for closing Guantanamo. But it’s tricky to come up with an alternative that will serve the interests of justice and America’s national security.
No. 9: In the category of euphemism, the prizewinning entry would be a recent editorial in a familiar newspaper that referred to terrorists we’ve captured as, quote, “abducted.” Here we have ruthless enemies of this country, stopped in their tracks by brave operatives in the service of America, and a major editorial page makes them sound like they were kidnap victims, picked up at random on their way to the movies.
No. 8: If fine speech-making, appeals to reason, or pleas for compassion had the power to move them, the terrorists would long ago have abandoned the field. And when they see the American government caught up in arguments about interrogations, or whether foreign terrorists have constitutional rights, they don’t stand back in awe of our legal system and wonder whether they had misjudged us all along. Instead the terrorists see just what they were hoping for – our unity gone, our resolve shaken, our leaders distracted. In short, they see weakness and opportunity.
No. 7: Yet having reserved for himself the authority to order enhanced interrogation after an emergency, you would think that President Obama would be less disdainful of what his predecessor authorized after 9/11. It’s almost gone unnoticed that the president has retained the power to order the same methods in the same circumstances. When they talk about interrogations, he and his administration speak as if they have resolved some great moral dilemma in how to extract critical information from terrorists. Instead they have put the decision off, while assigning a presumption of moral superiority to any decision they make in the future.
No. 6: To completely rule out enhanced interrogation methods in the future is unwise in the extreme. It is recklessness cloaked in righteousness, and would make the American people less safe.
No. 5: This recruitment-tool theory has become something of a mantra lately, including from the President himself. And after a familiar fashion, it excuses the violent and blames America for the evil that others do. It’s another version of that same old refrain from the Left, “We brought it on ourselves.” It is much closer to the truth that terrorists hate this country precisely because of the values we profess and seek to live by, not by some alleged failure to do so. Nor are terrorists or those who see them as victims exactly the best judges of America’s moral standards, one way or the other.
No. 4: Intelligence officers of the United States were not trying to rough up some terrorists simply to avenge the dead of 9/11. We know the difference in this country between justice and vengeance.
No. 3: To the very end of our administration, we kept al-Qaeda terrorists busy with other problems. We focused on getting their secrets, instead of sharing ours with them. And on our watch, they never hit this country again. After the most lethal and devastating terrorist attack ever, seven and a half years without a repeat is not a record to be rebuked and scorned, much less criminalized. It is a record to be continued until the danger has passed.
No. 2: In the fight against terrorism, there is no middle ground, and half-measures keep you half exposed. You cannot keep just some nuclear-armed terrorists out of the United States, you must keep every nuclear-armed terrorist out of the United States. Triangulation is a political strategy, not a national security strategy.
No. 1: Critics of our policies are given to lecturing on the theme of being consistent with American values. But no moral value held dear by the American people obliges public servants to sacrifice innocent lives to spare a captured terrorist from unpleasant things. And when an entire population is targeted by a terror network, nothing is more consistent with American values than to stop them.
Courtesy Editors of Fox Nation.
Mr. Cheney is perhaps one of the best VPs in American history. Unfortunately, most people, republicans and democrats, wont see the solid conservatism, strong morals, leadership and class this guy has since the media attacked him just as strongly as they did President Bush. Try it; mention Cheneys name and most people will roll their eyes and say, “ugh, Cheney… He’s sooooo evil”. Ask then, “what do you not like about him?”
9 times outta 10 the conversation will immediately turn to hunting accidents.
Public perception of Dick Cheney and most conservatives is heavily distorted by a left-leaning media willing to put objective journalism aside. Also unfortunate is the willingness of the masses to believe the media.
Cheney is ten times the man currently holding the VP office and is a hundred times smarter. Plus Cheney is honest, unlike Joe
BuffoonBiden.Hey, I just gotta say, this is ridiculous. I came to this site based on a banner ad that said ‘Never Forget’ and showed the U.S.S. Cole. I thought, “Damn right!”. Then, you have a picture of George W. Bush and a caption ‘God Bless America’.
Sir, Bush 43 totally screwed up the pursuit of bin Laden and did, indeed, appear to forget who was responsible for that reprehensible attack.
I then find this tidbit about Cheney’s ‘top ten’ as described by Fox Nation. There are several things about this piece that really bother me. Here’s a good one: calling some of the people at Guantanomo ‘abducted’ is actually accurate. There were dozens of guys that were picked up from their homes, not from battlefields, based on tips from their countrymen. Some of those guys were bad guys, and some weren’t. To gloss over that, to ignore the fact that injustice was done to at least some of the detainees, is wanton ignorance.
Calling all of them ‘adbucted’ is asinine, but that’s not what the op-ed piece did.
Number 3 is laughable on its face. They didn’t hit us again? Yeah, bub, they didn’t but they sure hit us once on your watch. I have never heard Cheney own up to the fact that the executive branch gave woefully inadequate attention to terrorism for its first 9 months, despite a clear warning from the previous President that it would be the number one issue for the new administration.
I don’t like Cheney because he will calmly and credibly lie if it suits his purposes. And I believe his purposes are likely not in the best interests of this country. Please go investigate ‘Project for a New American Century’, a neo-liberal cabal that wants to lead this country far, far astray from actual conservative values. I can’t believe you think Cheney is a conservative, after all the foreign intervention he has advocated, the spending without bounds, irresponsible fiscal policies he famously defended by saying ‘Deficits don’t matter’. Seriously, google that quote from Cheney. He’s no part conservative, and I despise him all the more for pretending to be something he’s not.
Cripes, I just saw your part about Biden being less honest than Cheney. Biden’s reputation is for being too honest, for saying things a politician shouldn’t say because they are too true. That’s part of what cost him the primary in 2008.
Look, do some research on the actual reasons people don’t like Cheney, and for goodness sake, don’t watch FNC for news.
Oh, but I did enjoy your photography. You have a talent with the camera, keep up the good work!
I bet Gilligan is a Ron Paul sorta guy . . .
That boy, Gilligan, must have been on too many two hour cruises. Regarding the tribute, he’s got a problem with President Bush being in it? And no outrage for the presence of Islamic Militants, the Taliban and Osama bin Laden? The depictions accurately reflect the history of the 9/11 events as far as I can tell.
And what’s wrong with God Bless America?
The boy has a Kool Aid drinking problem.
Hey Minstrel, allow me to quote myself:
“I came to this site based on a banner ad that said ‘Never Forget’ and showed the U.S.S. Cole. I thought, “Damn right!”. Then, you have a picture of George W. Bush and a caption ‘God Bless America’.
Sir, Bush 43 totally screwed up the pursuit of bin Laden and did, indeed, appear to forget who was responsible for that reprehensible attack.”
The reason I have a problem with the appearance of Bush is because he absolutely did forget about the U.S.S. Cole attack. I’m not letting Clinton off the hook, either, mind you. Here, check out the wiki page:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Cole_bombing
There was plenty of stuff that should have been done different.
there’s nothing wrong with God Bless America, though I prefer ‘may God bless America’, bit less demanding that way.
I like how you two manage to not have any substantive counter-points to my criticism of Cheneys’ top 10. “Ron Paul” and “Kool-Aid”. Fellas, that right there is why the Republican party is less relevant to America every day: you can’t just name-call and cheerlead, it doesn’t work any more. We’re operating in a marketplace of ideas here, you got to bring out your ideas and battle them out on their own merits.
That’s another problem I have with Cheney – I don’t think he has very good ideas. He thought it was a good idea to blow the cover off Valerie Plame as political retribution against her husband. I double-dog dare you to deny that as the motive, or to downplay Cheney’s involvement in that decision. And that is just not behavior you can condone in a guy you want to call classy or moral, as BullDada does above.
Did either of you go check out Project for a New American Century? Go read about it. See what those guys were writing back in the late 90’s, and look at what they did once they got in power. They stick to their principles, I’ll give them that.
Speaking of ideas, I suggest you, CapnBob, and your readers, write to your congressional representatives and express your sincere disinterest in obstruction for obstruction’s sake. Discussion, dissent, advice and counsel are what we need from our congresscritters, not the current spew of nay-saying coming from the Republicans. They need to show they are smarter and have better ideas, and I mean really show it, not claim it without doing their homework.